Julian Assange always said Russian hackers were not his source for the emails that took down Hillary.
He has never wavered, never changed his statement. His close associate, former British Ambassador (Uzbekistan) Craig Murray, has said the same. It was an inside job. Not Russian hackers.
These are the only two people in the world who know the source. Only two people who have actually met the source. Both deny Russian involvement. Both say it was a Clinton insider.
After new calls from the democrats to investigate the leaks, a stunned Murray came forward again to set the record straight.
“There is no Russian involvement in the leaks of emails showing Clinton’s corruption.”
“I know who leaked them.”
“I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian.”
“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two.”
CLOSE CLINTON CONFIDANT HATES HER MORE THAN PUTIN
The difference is that someone inside the DNC, a very close Clinton confidant, hates her more than Putin. Why else release evidence of her corruption and torpedo her coronation? Only someone close could have done this. And only someone close would have done this.
Because hatred that deep only comes from close association. It is impossible to have that much long-distance hate for someone you have never met.
Putin has no way of really knowing whether Trump or Clinton will be better for him either. He may have an idea, but to execute what he is accused of would be extremely hard, if not impossible. To try it,tTo risk WW3 on a coin flip seems absurd.
It is far more likely he was simply amused by the whole sordid affair.
Murray took aim at the hapless establishment media for blatantly spreading the Russian lie calling them, “Kafkaesque.”